[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact

Subject: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
From: dovid at telecurve.com (Dovid Bender)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 12:59:42 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <D1E3C2F1.2F37F%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <<[email protected]> > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Children!

Regards,

Dovid

-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Sender: "NANOG" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org>Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:20:23 
To: <tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com>
Cc: <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact

On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:58:31 -0000, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com said:

> > It seems most people colloquially use DDoS for both, and reserve DoS for
> > magic-packet blocking exploits like the latest BIND CVE, FYI.

> Then they are mistaken, unfortunately.

Feel free to try to reclaim the old meaning of the word "hacker" while
you're at it.  That ship sailed long ago, and so has the DoS/DDoS distinction.

References:
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: jason.leblanc at infusionsoft.com (Jason LeBlanc)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com (tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com (tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)

Prev by Date: GoDaddy : DDoS : : Contact
Next by Date: GoDaddy : DDoS : : Contact
Previous by thread: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
Next by thread: GoDaddy : DDoS : : Contact
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread