[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact

Subject: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:20:23 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:58:31 -0000." <[email protected]>
References: <D1E3C2F1.2F37F%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <<[email protected]>> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:58:31 -0000, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com said:

> > It seems most people colloquially use DDoS for both, and reserve DoS for
> > magic-packet blocking exploits like the latest BIND CVE, FYI.

> Then they are mistaken, unfortunately.

Feel free to try to reclaim the old meaning of the word "hacker" while
you're at it.  That ship sailed long ago, and so has the DoS/DDoS distinction.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150803/85c2fcf0/attachment.pgp>

Follow-Ups:
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com (tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: dovid at telecurve.com (Dovid Bender)

References:
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: jason.leblanc at infusionsoft.com (Jason LeBlanc)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com (tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
  - From: tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com (tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com)

Prev by Date: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
Next by Date: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
Previous by thread: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
Next by thread: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread