content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

[collin at averysmallbird.com (Collin Anderson)]

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:32 AM, John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

> With the "legal content" rule, I expect some bottom feeding bulk
> mailers to sue claiming that their CAN SPAM compliant spam is legal,
> therefore the providers can't block it.
>

How would this legal environment be any different than the pre-Verizon
network neutrality rules for network management of SPAM?


-- 
*Collin David Anderson*
averysmallbird.com | @cda | Washington, D.C.