[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

What is lawful content? [was VZ...]

Subject: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:42:50 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:28:11 -0400." <[email protected]>
References: <D1164EF6.F9D65%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAORNjypWWuibnRLTnCmJBmwq9vGbw6inw7GsLKNQ68-cDtkDgg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:28:11 -0400, deleskie at gmail.com said:
> I wonder if lawyer sit around all day and argue about CIDR notation

Almost certainly not, because there's no murky gray areas about CIDR
notation, much less ones that potentially affect how they do their jobs.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150227/a939645c/attachment.pgp>

References:
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: weaselkeeper at gmail.com (Jim Richardson)
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: deleskie at gmail.com (deleskie at gmail.com)

Prev by Date: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
Next by Date: utility capacity, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
Previous by thread: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
Next by thread: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread