[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

Subject: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
From: tdurack at gmail.com (Tim Durack)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:00:39 -0500
In-reply-to: <627266B72B856946BCD625D4B34B1916A31F96@INF-EXCH-MB-02.gammatelecom.com>
References: <CAE_ug14jhRj6D+51u5FCEKKUHosq-c8Wjrq1Cwkgog83xK123A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAE_ug16FGyQXsTuyP9o+uTDhdNpGBgFE6H5EbU4TDHb73Vm1UQ@mail.gmail.com> <627266B72B856946BCD625D4B34B1916A31F96@INF-EXCH-MB-02.gammatelecom.com>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
> wrote:

> > Of Tim Durack
> > Sent: 20 February 2015 14:00
> > IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic.
> >
>
> And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network
> operators.
>
> adam
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast.
> For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
> ------------------------------
>

I don't consider unique addressing of infrastructure a whim.

-- 
Tim:>

References:
- draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
  - From: tdurack at gmail.com (Tim Durack)
- draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
  - From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)
- draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
  - From: tdurack at gmail.com (Tim Durack)

Prev by Date: What would you do about questionable domain pointing A record to your IP address?
Next by Date: Weekly Routing Table Report
Previous by thread: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
Next by thread: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread