[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design
- Subject: [OT] Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:11:18 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2015 22:21:00 +1100." <CAEUfUGPQAxkeiOC7twWjhpsZApBTa3teqT+oX6XusjA=Fzd0Ew@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAP-guGXbROqdfXb=Q8zwXN67w+WXFVqi0rpdoe6Wi_goJ5yVzg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAEUfUGPQAxkeiOC7twWjhpsZApBTa3teqT+oX6XusjA=Fzd0Ew@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 22:21:00 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:
> Personally, I don't think so. Sure some awesomely smart engineers designed
> this... but did they 'create' anything to do it?
I already cited legislative history that indicates that even things like
phone directories are suitable for copyright protection. That "creation" bar
is pretty darned low.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150214/e58da4ff/attachment.pgp>