[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware
- Subject: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware
- From: ammar at fastreturn.net (Ammar Zuberi)
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:52:24 +0400
- In-reply-to: <CALFTrnMDuWch9vXVs4W8VFwAjPgCx+gB=hYxN05GD2yQP4bU8g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALFTrnN+9pkKz3CZur5zc2nFs2+mOp7OJq0ihAxqfXGOXdGhQw@mail.gmail.com> <15020604.4147.1423575243412.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <CALFTrnMDuWch9vXVs4W8VFwAjPgCx+gB=hYxN05GD2yQP4bU8g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Here in Dubai they have a wide FTTH deployment (almost 80% of homes and offices) with almost no copper in the service provider networks.
They use these Planet devices in every deployment I've taken a look at so far.
Ammar
> On 10 Feb 2015, at 6:42 pm, Ray Soucy <rps at maine.edu> wrote:
>
> Price and functionality-wise Planet MGSW-28240F and GSD-1020S look
> pretty close to what I'm looking for. Anyone have real experience
> with using them on a large scale? Performance?
>
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
>> Check out Mikrotik, Planet and TP-Link.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "Ray Soucy" <rps at maine.edu>
>> To: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 7:31:22 AM
>> Subject: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware
>>
>> One thing I'm personally interested in is the growth of municipal FTTx
>> that's starting to happen around the US and possibly applying that
>> model to highly rural areas (e.g. 10 mile long town with no side
>> streets, existing utility polls, 250 or so homes) and doing a
>> realistic cost analysis of what that would take.
>>
>> What options are out there for Active-Ethernet hardware. Ideally
>> something that could handle G.8032 and 802.1ad in hardware for the
>> distribution side (24 or 48-port SFP metro switch) and something
>> inexpensive for the access side but still managed (e.g. a 4-port
>> switch with an SFP uplink supporting Q-in-Q).
>>
>> I'm really looking for something cheap to keep costs down for a
>> proof-of-concept. The stuff from Cisco and even Ciena is a bit more
>> expensive than my target.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ray Patrick Soucy
>> Network Engineer
>> University of Maine System
>>
>> T: 207-561-3526
>> F: 207-561-3531
>>
>> MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
>> www.maineren.net
>
>
>
> --
> Ray Patrick Soucy
> Network Engineer
> University of Maine System
>
> T: 207-561-3526
> F: 207-561-3531
>
> MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
> www.maineren.net