[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
- Subject: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
- From: CrawfordS at evangel.edu (Crawford, Scott)
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:57:37 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAB-EkT75-oQ5ASqkmxNqKZBRcJ9q_RWaahd9-uUA1edK8eQ+ag@mail.gmail.com> <CAP-guGWx=tYTCPCMF5Lkh_gsqSTDyWXh9BNRGNDDy2zSNO7qEw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Jan 30, 2015, at 07:37 , Owen DeLong <owen at delong> wrote:
> /48 for all customer sites is not at all unreasonable and is fully supported by ARIN policy.
>Where Bill is correct is that some customers may have more than one site. The official
>policy definition of a site is a single building or structure, or, in the case of a multi-tenant
>building or structure, a single tenant within that building. Yes, this could technically
>mean that a college dorm contains thousands of sites and could justify thousands of /48s.
Is this your recommendation for colleges? Or, are you simply pointing out a possible interpretation of ARIN policy?