[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Production-scale NAT64
- Subject: Production-scale NAT64
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:16:11 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAD6AjGTGeQpi9udS8Bf1AVnF9SPw25fH=De1R25M6AoBN_TXtQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <20150826T141310Z@localhost> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTGeQpi9udS8Bf1AVnF9SPw25fH=De1R25M6AoBN_TXtQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said:
> Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic
> require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6
> (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Linkedin and so on ...).
So I'm guessing that 75% of the traffic flows with better latency than
the 25% IPvhorse-n-buggy traffic? ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150826/b5e2f5bd/attachment.pgp>