[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
- Subject: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
- From: fdelmotte1 at mac.com (Fabien Delmotte)
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:42:37 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAOLsBOuQP1m8u=1H_nre9jaExONfJ16rs0h=O4m7_+Gt5q9d7g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAOLsBOuQP1m8u=1H_nre9jaExONfJ16rs0h=O4m7_+Gt5q9d7g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello
My 2 cents
You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you have just to play with the API.
Regards
Fabien
> Le 12 ao?t 2015 ? 16:28, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish at gmail.com> a ?crit :
>
>>
>>
>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
>> From: "marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr" <marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr>
>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
>> Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906 at yahoo.fr>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>>
>> anybody from this impressive list ?:
>>
>> https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
>>
>> -- Marcel
>>
>>
>>
> Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the
> market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?
>
> Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
> positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ramy