RES: Exploits start against flaw that could hamstring huge swaths of

[jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Helms" <khelms at zcorum.com>

> On Aug 4, 2015 9:38 AM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Scott Helms <khelms at zcorum.com>
> > wrote:
> > > With the (large) caveat that heterogenous networks are more
> > > subject to human error in many cases.
> >
> > <cough>automate!</cough>

> Automation just means your mistake goes many more places more quickly.

Not necessarily.

The sort of failure you're talking about, Scott, is "user did the wrong 
thing", and sure, automation makes it easier for that to spread.

Chris was, though, I think, suggesting automating around "user tries to do
the right thing on disjoint devices, and fails *because they're disjoint*";
that is, clearly, a problem automation can help with.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274