[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Working with Spamhaus
- Subject: Working with Spamhaus
- From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:17:32 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAAARkvKXqPG991hA3fFQZ3DPaJ0sNMQOj-ZrWJVM_U6rEAGpnw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <SN1PR08MB14382D07A9C1C2EAE7E334A8838B0@SN1PR08MB1438.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <[email protected]> <SN1PR08MB1438AEAFD00FB8042E2BEB08838A0@SN1PR08MB1438.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAGkwwuOSAccvaDfr94_MmiBAGZjEFrNEGuRy1qt5023wLO10ig@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
It's what they call a free country
Those that don't use it don't use it, and those who do are free to do so
--srs
> On 31-Jul-2015, at 4:56 PM, Ricky Beam <jfbeam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:28:34 -0400, Jaren Angerbauer <jarenangerbauer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I work for Proofpoint -- we acquired SORBS back in 2011.
>
> Hint: The Internet has a LONG memory.
>
> The liberal and numerous dropping of "for free" makes me laugh. "You" knew the tainted nature of what you were buying. Nobody, to this day, places much trust at all in SORBS. I dare say there isn't anyone on NANOG (certainly any "long hairs") that haven't had at least one interaction with SORBS, most likely due to spamtraps; that number drops to almost zero when you put the word "good" in that sentence. Maybe it's better now under new management; we (the royal we) moved on long ago.