[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MPLS for IPv6
On Friday 07 November 2008 17:22:33 David Freedman wrote:
> So please, if you are spending your hard earned cash,
> please ask for an LDP6 implementation, "no demand" should
> not be the case.
I sent our SE's at C & J yet another reminder about this.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20081110/2bbf3056/attachment.bin>