[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NTP Md5 or AutoKey?

Subject: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
From: kurtis at kurtis.pp.se (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:56:36 +0100
In-reply-to: <A868F243F1934C26848C2270469A2CFE@ltdbeast>
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <A868F243F1934C26848C2270469A2CFE@ltdbeast>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 4 nov 2008, at 10.14, Lincoln Dale wrote:

>> There is an emerging need to distribute highly accurate time
>> information over IP and over MPLS packet switched networks (PSNs).
>
> good of you to ask. it exists today.
> http://ieee1588.nist.gov/

Just a shame the world is not built on Ethernets. IETF tried to do  
TICTOC which will/could have done a better time-transfer over any IP  
network. But...let's see...

Best regards,

- - kurtis -



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkS95QACgkQAFdZ6xrc/t5kvQCgscel1cEN2rid9sznzaAGPbi0
7BAAn1BsqRrZzFMTfDJHbctMeGkXxVKu
=7A5W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
  - From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)
- NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
  - From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)
- NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
  - From: ltd at interlink.com.au (Lincoln Dale)

Prev by Date: Internet partitioning event regulations (was: RE: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent)
Next by Date: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
Previous by thread: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
Next by thread: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread