[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Sprint / Cogent dispute over?

Subject: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
From: deepak at ai.net (Deepak Jain)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:42:23 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <409AEFDAAE9C4CD590153AB68AB6EF01@D88CFA77634F40F> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

At 06:54 PM 11/2/2008, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:
> > Problem resolved?
>
>https://www.sprint.net/cogent.php

Since there is active litigation going on over this, it's also possible an attorney said, "hmmm... maybe you should wait until the judge
has rendered an opinion -- and they got to their temporary re-establishment."

I haven't looked, and don't know if I have access, to the court's motions/filings on this matter.

Deepak

References:
- Why do some companies get depeered and some don't?
  - From: brandon.galbraith at gmail.com (Brandon Galbraith)
- Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
  - From: repstein at chello.at (Randy Epstein)
- Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
  - From: dr at cluenet.de (Daniel Roesen)
- Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
  - From: dts at senie.com (Daniel Senie)

Prev by Date: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts
Next by Date: routing around Sprint's depeering damage
Previous by thread: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
Next by thread: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread