[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

routing around Sprint's depeering damage

Subject: routing around Sprint's depeering damage
From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:04:08 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Dave Blaine wrote:

> Which is the best way?

More regs and more laws is certainly not in the running.

How about:  If there is a need, somebody will provide at a suitable 
price?  If no body steps up, we don't need it.

Follow-Ups:
- routing around Sprint's depeering damage
  - From: mvgfr1 at gmail.com (Marc Farnum Rendino)
- routing around Sprint's depeering damage
  - From: mvgfr1 at gmail.com (Marc Farnum Rendino)

References:
- routing around Sprint's depeering damage
  - From: dfblaine at gmail.com (Dave Blaine)

Prev by Date: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent
Next by Date: Sending vs requesting. Was: Re: Sprint / Cogent
Previous by thread: routing around Sprint's depeering damage
Next by thread: routing around Sprint's depeering damage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread