Cypherpunk Inadequacies / Why the 60's failed

[mirimir at riseup.net (Mirimir)]

On 09/05/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/05/2017 12:54 PM, John Newman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 3, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/03/2017 12:05 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 09/02/2017 09:06 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>>>> A "store" for SK's top 10% wealth transfer? Lol, designed.
>>>>> Less time hobbled on "psychedelics".
>>>>> More time on "revolutin".
>>>>> Or at least gettin hippie dirty, jiggystyle.
>>>>> Crypto rave, on.
> 
> 
>>> Reportedly good blotter has been available on SR etc.
>>>
>>
>> On SR, then alphabay - excellent mdma also.
>>
>> These services (well, their descendants) are obviously risky as fuck. 
>> Better to source privately if possible.
> 
> Simple rule:  Cop only from people you know, and don't eat anything they
> have not already.

That is of course prudent advice :)

However, it is possible to test unknowns safely enough. You start with
an extremely low dose. Perhaps 1% of the purported normal dose. And then
retest at higher dosages. A reasonable set of dosages might be 1%, 2%,
5%, 10%, 20%, 50% and 100%. Or more, if you like.

See PiHKAL and TiHKAL :) He started with untested compounds.

Albert Hofmann did get gobsmacked, I admit. But it didn't kill him. I
once inadvertently took a few milligrams of LSD. It was indeed intense,
but no more than some DMT experiences. Did last a lot longer, though.

> "Stoned on some new potion he found upon the wall of some unholy
> bathroom in some ungodly hall" all too accurately describes people who
> buy WTF-ever from darknet vendors.  Same shit, different decade.
> 
> :o/