[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
POTUS jammin'
Yea, I was referring to emissions shielding, so that when in "receive" mode there is little or no signal output from the device that can indicate its presence to a targeted jammer.
On 30 November 2014 07:30:49 GMT+00:00, coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 11/29/14, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...
>> Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't a shielded receiver be a
>> useless receiver?
>
>not a bad question;
> you don't appreciate variable attenuation until you've used it
>effectively to locate an emitter or test specific boundary conditions.
>
>also note that shielding may be partial to eliminate or deflect
>emissions from a given direction.
>
>best regards,
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20141130/cac5668d/attachment.html>