[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] VM for WAN connection?
- Subject: [ale] VM for WAN connection?
- From: james.sumners at gmail.com (James Sumners)
- Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 14:08:39 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAAt=rgCX778LgKmzVNSdHCJvO-Fc2+mEq6ZwkVEnC-ARkxv1DQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Alex Carver <agcarver+ale at acarver.net>
wrote:
> Don't bother. Too much extra overhead and if something with the VM
> system fails or is compromised then lots of other problems happen.
>
> Just set the thing up to pass whatever open ports you need straight
> through and open the service ports (SSH, etc.) to only the inside
> network. If you need to access the router from the outside, bounce
> through an internal machine first instead of allowing a direct
> connection to the router.
>
> You could also set the internal service ports to accept connections from
> only a select few internal machines.
>
Turns out it doesn't even matter. I wasn't thinking about the CPU when I
had my little brainstorm. The CPU doesn't support VT extensions and that
just isn't worth the slowness --
http://ark.intel.com/products/77774/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G3220T-3M-Cache-2_60-GHz
--
James Sumners
http://james.sumners.info/ (technical profile)
http://jrfom.com/ (personal site)
http://haplo.bandcamp.com/ (band page)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150926/adb89fcb/attachment.html>