[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] MS vs Linux on PCs, laptops
- Subject: [ale] MS vs Linux on PCs, laptops
- From: jkinney at jimkinney.us (Jim Kinney)
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 16:10:19 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAGivMpSvEa2OtFq7Y9vS6=8H1avB3Y_EZw3fNXfj2pjN0zgWbA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAGivMpSvEa2OtFq7Y9vS6=8H1avB3Y_EZw3fNXfj2pjN0zgWbA@mail.gmail.com>
Dell. Search for "developer edition". My XPS13 has no M$ installed.
On September 7, 2015 3:56:02 PM EDT, David Jackson <deepbsd.ale at gmail.com> wrote:
>So, does anyone know why somebody like Lenovo includes MS by default on
>their laptops? Is it just because MS will only agree to give them a
>discount if they agree to an exclusive 100%-MS installation on shipped
>devices?
>
>I bought a laptop from Emperor Linux here in town, and even they had MS
>installed as a dual boot. It'd be great to just get a laptop without
>any
>operating system on it, and *not* have to pay for any MS license in the
>process...
>
>What are the chances of that ever happening I wonder? :-\
>
>Dave
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150907/648cb6e1/attachment.html>